At a glance
| Alye | Langfuse | |
|---|---|---|
| How data is collected | Python, Node.js and Java SDKs that wrap the official clients, or OpenTelemetry | SDKs and OpenTelemetry |
| Open source and self-hosting | SDKs are Apache 2.0; the service is hosted only | Open-source core that can be self-hosted |
| Free plan | 500,000 calls a month, 14 days of history, 3 members | Hobby: 50,000 units a month, 30 days of data access, 2 users |
| Entry paid plan | Team: $49 a month for 10 million calls, 90 days, unlimited members | Core: $29 a month for 100,000 units, then $8 per 100,000; 90 days; unlimited users |
| What is counted | One model call; agent steps and tool calls are not counted | Units: traces, observations and scores each count |
| Regional and marketplace prices | Azure OpenAI deployment types, Vertex AI regions, Bedrock regions and profiles | Not listed on its pricing page |
| Spend per customer | Built in, with monthly budgets per customer | Views per user and session |
| Alerts | Spend, forecast, error rate, latency and silent services, to Slack, Teams or email, checked every minute | Spend alerts by email; 2 to 100 alerts depending on plan |
| Evaluation and prompt management | Not offered | Yes: evaluations, datasets and prompt management |
Which one to choose
Choose Langfuse if
- You need to self-host for compliance or cost.
- Evaluations, datasets and prompt management are your main need.
- Your volume is small, so per-unit pricing stays low.
Choose Alye if
- You need correct costs for Azure OpenAI, Vertex AI or Bedrock regions.
- You bill or budget per customer.
- You want alerts in Slack or Teams, not just dashboards and email.
- Agents make many steps per request, so per-unit pricing would add up.
Using both
Many teams run both: Langfuse for evaluation and prompt work, Alye for production cost and alerts. Alye adds no proxy, so trying it on one service is low risk.
Also compared: Alye vs Helicone · Alye vs LangSmith. New to the topic? Start with what LLM observability is.